Institutional Ownership

Ownership > 100%

Ownership Information

Shares Outstanding

30,244,599

Short Interest Shares

176,540

Float (%)

87.63

Institutional Ownership (%)

50.65

Mutual Fund Ownership (%)

31.75

Insider Ownership (%)

12.37

Top 10 Instn Holders (%)

35.09

Ownership Activity - Total Positions

Company	Shares	% Out	Value ($)	Reported	Change
Hallador Investment Advisors Inc.	1,671,465	5.53	9,460,492	3/29/2019	0
Yorktown Partners LLC	1,415,998	4.68	8,014,549	5/15/2019	(500,000)
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP	1,293,415	4.28	7,320,729	3/31/2019	53,311
BlackRock Inc.	944,562	3.12	5,346,221	3/31/2019	(36,756)
Vanguard Group Inc.	678,947	2.24	3,842,840	3/31/2019	147,808
Oakcliff Capital Partners, L.P.	557,189	1.84	3,153,690	3/31/2019	0
Acadian Asset Management LLC	534,206	1.77	3,023,606	3/31/2019	(12,748)
Renaissance Technologies LLC	375,900	1.24	2,127,594	3/31/2019	69,877
T. Rowe Price Group Inc.	353,217	1.17	1,999,208	3/31/2019	131,941
Numeric Investors LLC	310,043	1.03	1,754,843	3/31/2019	(38,600)
BNY Asset Management	296,809	0.98	1,679,939	3/31/2019	9,412
State Street Global Advisors Inc.	257,584	0.85	1,457,925	3/31/2019	(15,438)
Northern Trust Global Investments	244,448	0.81	1,383,576	3/31/2019	2,231
CornerCap Investment Counsel Inc	243,085	0.80	1,375,861	3/31/2019	22,130
Cove Street Capital LLC	225,000	0.74	1,273,500	3/31/2019	25,000
Bridgeway Capital Management Inc.	209,200	0.69	1,184,072	3/31/2019	17,600
Sterling Capital Management LLC	195,613	0.65	1,107,170	3/31/2019	(436)
Geode Capital Management LLC	194,399	0.64	1,100,298	3/31/2019	952
AJO LP	184,757	0.61	1,045,725	3/31/2019	(15,213)
PanAgora Asset Management Inc.	169,400	0.56	958,804	3/31/2019	(3,979)

Displaying 1 to 20 (of 120)

Ownership Summary

Ownership Summary

Institutional Ownership

Total Positions

New Positions

Increased Positions

Decreased Positions

Soldout Positions

Net Change

List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:

Double-counting - On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.

Short Interest - A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.

A gap between 'as of' dates - In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.

Other possible reasons: a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions; b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues; c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.