Institutional Ownership

Ownership > 100%

Ownership Information

Shares Outstanding

30,244,599

Short Interest Shares

76,210

Float (%)

87.66

Institutional Ownership (%)

51.52

Mutual Fund Ownership (%)

35.51

Insider Ownership (%)

12.34

Top 10 Instn Holders (%)

37.20

Ownership Activity - Total Positions

Company	Shares	% Out	Value ($)	Reported	Change
Hallador Investment Advisors Inc.	1,671,465	5.53	9,844,929	3/29/2018	0
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP	1,240,104	4.10	7,304,213	12/31/2018	76,361
BlackRock Inc.	981,318	3.24	5,779,963	12/31/2018	25,988
Oakcliff Capital Partners, L.P.	557,189	1.84	3,281,843	12/31/2018	0
Acadian Asset Management LLC	546,954	1.81	3,221,559	12/31/2018	(28,171)
Vanguard Group Inc.	531,139	1.76	3,128,409	12/31/2018	(378,896)
Numeric Investors LLC	348,643	1.15	2,053,507	12/31/2018	(21,700)
Renaissance Technologies LLC	306,023	1.01	1,802,475	12/31/2018	34,767
BNY Asset Management	287,397	0.95	1,692,768	12/31/2018	15,003
State Street Global Advisors Inc.	273,022	0.90	1,608,100	12/31/2018	(274)
Northern Trust Global Investments	242,217	0.80	1,426,658	12/31/2018	(1,679)
T. Rowe Price Group Inc.	221,276	0.73	1,303,316	12/31/2018	97,889
CornerCap Investment Counsel Inc	220,955	0.73	1,301,425	12/31/2018	(6,200)
Cove Street Capital LLC	200,000	0.66	1,178,000	12/31/2018	0
AJO LP	199,970	0.66	1,177,823	12/31/2018	5,093
Sterling Capital Management LLC	196,049	0.65	1,154,729	12/31/2018	57,369
Geode Capital Management LLC	193,447	0.64	1,139,403	12/31/2018	9,229
Bridgeway Capital Management Inc.	191,600	0.63	1,128,524	12/31/2018	0
PanAgora Asset Management Inc.	173,379	0.57	1,021,202	12/31/2018	0
Peter B. Cannell & Co. Inc.	159,350	0.53	938,572	12/31/2018	0

Displaying 1 to 20 (of 120)

Ownership Summary

Ownership Summary

Institutional Ownership

Total Positions

New Positions

Increased Positions

Decreased Positions

Soldout Positions

Net Change

List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:

Double-counting - On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.

Short Interest - A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.

A gap between 'as of' dates - In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.

Other possible reasons: a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions; b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues; c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.