Institutional Ownership

Ownership > 100%

Ownership Information

Shares Outstanding

30,465,665

Short Interest Shares

550,360

Float (%)

87.36

Institutional Ownership (%)

50.67

Mutual Fund Ownership (%)

32.36

Insider Ownership (%)

12.64

Top 10 Instn Holders (%)

40.15

Ownership Activity - Total Positions

Company	Shares	% Out	Value ($)	Reported	Change
Hallador Investment Advisors Inc.	1,671,465	5.49	1,420,578	5/31/2020	0
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP	1,296,376	4.26	1,101,790	3/31/2020	(60,116)
BlackRock, Inc.	1,139,330	3.74	968,317	3/31/2020	(20,790)
Yorktown Partners LLC	965,998	3.17	821,002	5/31/2020	0
Vanguard Group Inc.	828,033	2.72	703,745	3/31/2020	1,478
Oakcliff Capital Partners, L.P.	557,189	1.83	473,555	3/31/2020	0
Renaissance Technologies LLC	545,256	1.79	463,413	3/31/2020	129,198
Acadian Asset Management LLC	472,716	1.55	401,761	3/31/2020	(75,040)
State Street Global Advisors Inc.	335,875	1.10	285,460	3/31/2020	33,859
Northern Trust Global Investments	315,667	1.04	268,285	3/31/2020	20,019
Cove Street Capital LLC	300,000	0.98	254,970	3/31/2020	0
Geode Capital Management LLC	265,454	0.87	225,609	3/31/2020	29,411
Bridgeway Capital Management, Inc.	195,600	0.64	166,240	3/31/2020	(13,600)
Winton Group Ltd.	194,971	0.64	165,706	6/30/2020	145,924
BNY Asset Management	183,409	0.60	155,879	3/31/2020	32,074
Oldfield Partners LLP	164,204	0.54	139,557	6/30/2020	0
Peter B. Cannell & Co., Inc.	159,350	0.52	135,432	6/30/2020	0
Zebra Capital Management LLC	74,222	0.24	63,081	3/31/2020	(5,315)
UBS Asset Management AG	70,460	0.23	59,884	6/30/2020	(13,787)
Barings LLC	69,239	0.23	58,846	3/31/2020	0

Displaying 1 to 20 (of 111)

Ownership Summary

Ownership Summary

Institutional Ownership

Total Positions

New Positions

Increased Positions

Decreased Positions

Soldout Positions

Net Change

List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:

Double-counting - On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.

Short Interest - A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.

A gap between 'as of' dates - In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.

Other possible reasons: a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions; b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues; c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.