Institutional Ownership

Ownership > 100%

Ownership Information

Shares Outstanding

30,176,990

Short Interest Shares

116,714

Float (%)

71.79

Institutional Ownership (%)

35.73

Mutual Fund Ownership (%)

35.53

Insider Ownership (%)

28.21

Top 10 Instn Holders (%)

23.26

Ownership Activity - Total Positions

Company	Shares	% Out	Value ($)	Reported	Change
Hallador Investment Advisors Inc.	1,671,465	5.54	8,608,045	3/29/2018	0
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP	1,163,743	3.86	5,993,276	9/30/2018	117,819
BlackRock Inc.	955,330	3.17	4,919,950	9/30/2018	5,436
Vanguard Group Inc.	910,035	3.02	4,686,680	9/30/2018	(15,368)
Acadian Asset Management LLC	575,125	1.91	2,961,894	9/30/2018	(115,697)
Oakcliff Capital Partners, L.P.	557,189	1.85	2,869,523	9/30/2018	0
Numeric Investors LLC	370,343	1.23	1,907,266	9/30/2018	6,900
State Street Global Advisors Inc.	273,296	0.91	1,407,474	9/30/2018	15,854
BNY Asset Management	272,394	0.90	1,402,829	9/30/2018	4,772
Renaissance Technologies LLC	271,256	0.90	1,396,968	9/30/2018	54,456
Northern Trust Global Investments	243,896	0.81	1,256,064	9/30/2018	16,590
CornerCap Investment Counsel Inc	227,155	0.75	1,169,848	9/30/2018	30,065
Cove Street Capital LLC	200,000	0.66	1,030,000	9/30/2018	17,886
AJO LP	194,877	0.65	1,003,617	9/30/2018	119,807
Bridgeway Capital Management Inc.	191,600	0.63	986,740	9/30/2018	50,000
Geode Capital Management LLC	184,218	0.61	948,723	9/30/2018	6,853
PanAgora Asset Management Inc.	173,379	0.57	892,902	9/30/2018	(8,665)
Peter B. Cannell & Co. Inc.	159,350	0.53	820,653	9/30/2018	0
Invesco Ltd.	150,230	0.50	773,685	9/30/2018	(2,400)
Sterling Capital Management LLC	138,680	0.46	714,202	9/30/2018	0

Displaying 1 to 20 (of 120)

Ownership Summary

Ownership Summary

Institutional Ownership

Total Positions

New Positions

Increased Positions

Decreased Positions

Soldout Positions

Net Change

List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:

Double-counting - On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.

Short Interest - A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.

A gap between 'as of' dates - In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.

Other possible reasons: a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions; b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues; c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.